And women with small breasts and narrow hips are considered “fake women”? Is this like telling the difference between a real Louis Vouitton purse and a knockoff? Who comes up with this shit? What is the definitive criteria for being considered a real woman? How many curves are required? Is there a minimum and/or maximum measurement of these curves that are considered requisite to being categorized as a real woman? Are there certain areas where curves must be present and other areas where the curves are irrelevant? Is it okay if one has narrow hips but has big boobs or big hips and no boobs? Must you have both? If a flat chested, narrow hipped woman purchases tit and ass implants, does she get promoted to “real” status? What about athletic woman, like runners or swimmers? They are typically very lean, does that make them fake?
I have some images that I need categorized; are these women real or fake:
I am 7 months pregnant and am anything BUT thin. I have curves to spare. My boobs are comically large and my stomach is huge and my ass is catching up to my front. I am a safety hazard to the general public if I turn around within 5 feet of other people. I just didn’t think that my measurements were the defining characteristic of “real” womanhood. I thought it was a vagina. Do very thin, narrow hipped, flat chested women not have vaginas? Does it turn into a penis or close up and become smooth, like a barbie? Although, barbie’s actual measurements would have made her very top heavy, with a small waist and large hips, so she would have been “real” by the curves rule of thumb. Even when I was really thin and had almost no curves, I always had my vagina. Now, I can get behind changing the rules to “real women have vaginas”. Let’s make it official and get t-shirts.